MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210604509 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.121.263254

First-in-Humans Evaluation of <sup>18</sup>F-SMBT-1, a Novel <sup>18</sup>F-Labeled Monoamine Oxidase-B PET Tracer for Imaging Reactive Astrogliosis

2022· article· en· W4210604509 on OpenAlexaff
Victor L. Villemagne, Ryuichi Harada, Vincent Doré, Shozo Furumoto, Rachel S. Mulligan, Yukitsuka Kudo, Samantha C. Burnham, Natasha Krishnadas, Svetlana Bozinovski, Kun Huang, Brian J. Lopresti, Kazuhiko Yanai, Christopher C. Rowe, Nobuyuki Okamura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilUniversity of Pittsburgh
KeywordsAstrogliosisSelegilineMonoamine oxidase BNeurodegenerationChemistryGliosisMonoamine oxidaseWhite matterPittsburgh compound BMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineInternal medicineNeuroscienceAlzheimer's diseaseMedicinePathologyPsychologyBiochemistryParkinson's diseaseCentral nervous systemDiseaseEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Reactive gliosis changes, characterized by reactive astrocytes and activated microglia, contribute greatly to neurodegeneration throughout the course of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Reactive astrocytes overexpress monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B). We characterized the clinical performance of 18F-SMBT-1, a novel MAO-B PET tracer as a potential surrogate marker of reactive astrogliosis. Methods: Seventy-seven participants –53 controls (CN), 7 mild cognitively impaired (MCI), 7 AD patients, and 10 young controls (YCN)– were recruited for the different aspects of the study. Older participants underwent 3D-MPRAGE MRI and Aβ, tau, and 18F-SMBT-1 imaging with PET. To ascertain 18F-SMBT-1 selectivity to MAO-B, 9 participants underwent two 18F-SMBT-1 scans, before and after receiving 5mg selegiline twice daily for 5 days. To compare selectivity, 18F-THK5351 studies were also conducted before and after selegiline. Aβ burden was expressed in Centiloids. 18F-SMBT-1 outcomes were expressed as standard uptake value, as well as tissue ratios and binding parameters using the subcortical white matter as reference region. Results:18F-SMBT-1 showed robust entry into the brain and reversible binding kinetics, with high tracer retention in basal ganglia, intermediate in cortical regions, and lowest in cerebellum and white matter which tightly follows the known regional brain distribution of MAO-B (R2=0.84). More than 85% of 18F-SMBT-1 signal was blocked by selegiline across the brain and, in contrast to 18F-THK5351, no residual cortical activity was observed after the selegiline regimen, indicating high selectivity for MAO-B and low non-specific binding. 18F-SMBT-1 also captured the known MAO-B increases with age, with an annual rate of change (~2.6%/yr), similar to the in vitro rates of change (~1.9%/yr). Quantitative and semiquantitative measures of 18F-SMBT-1 binding were highly associated (R2>0.94), suggesting a simplified tissue ratio approach could be used to generate outcome measures. Conclusion:18F-SMBT-1 is a highly selective MAO-B tracer, with low non-specific binding, high entry into the brain and displaying reversible kinetics. Moreover, 18F-SMBT-1 brain distribution matches the reported in vitro distribution and captures the known MAO-B increases with age, suggesting 18F-SMBT-1 can potentially be used as a surrogate marker of reactive astrogliosis. Further validation of these findings with 18F-SMBT-1 will require examination of a much larger series, including participants with MCI and AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207