The complete mitochondrial genome of the spot prawn,<i>Pandalus platyceros</i>Brandt in von Middendorf, 1851 (Decapoda: Caridea: Pandalidae), assembled from linked-reads sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pandalus platyceros Brandt in von Middendorf, 1851, the spot prawn, is a commercially important pandalid shrimp that sustains a small fishery in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. We report, for the first time, the complete mitochondrial genome of P. platyceros, while also testing whether linked-reads sequencing (10X Genomics) data can be used to assemble complete and accurate mitochondrial genomes. The pipeline GetOrganelle assembled and circularized the complete mitochondrial chromosome of P. platyceros with an average coverage of 28.2x from a dataset of 5 M pairs of linked reads. The AT-rich mitochondrial genome of P. platyceros is 16,628 bp in length and comprised of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 ribosomal RNA genes, and 24 transfer RNA genes. One copy of all tRNA genes was present, except for tRNA-G, which had three copies. A single 1,077 bp-long intergenic space was assumed to be the D-loop/Control region. Selective pressure analysis indicated the PCGs were under purifying selection, although levels differed among genes. The highest KA:KS ratios were found in nad4 and nad4l, suggesting weaker purifying selection and environmental constraints on these genes. The KA:KS ratios for cob and cox1 were a magnitude lower than the ratios in other PCGs, suggesting strong purifying selection acting upon these genes. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis based on all PCGs that included a total of 91 species of shrimps supported the monophyly of the infraorder Caridea and family Pandalidae. Furthermore, the monophyly of other caridean families, including Alvinocaridae, Atyidae, Thoridae, Lysmatidae, and Palaemonidae was also supported by the same analysis. Our results thus suggest that mitochondrial PCGs have enough phylogenetic information to resolve relationships at high taxonomic levels (families) in Caridea. This study contributes new genomic resources for this commercially important species and demonstrates that linked-reads sequencing can be used to assemble accurate mitochondrial genomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".