MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4211148369 · doi:10.3138/ptc.62.5

ELECTROPHYSICAL AGENTS - Contraindications And Precautions: An Evidence-Based Approach To Clinical Decision Making In Physical Therapy

2010· article· en· W4211148369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiotherapy Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceClinical PracticeHumanitiesNiceKnowledge translationHealth carePsychologyMedicineLibrary sciencePolitical scienceNursingPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physiotherapy Canada is the official, scholarly, refereed journal of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, giving direction to excellence in clinical science and reasoning, knowledge translation, therapeutic skills and patient-centred care.Recognized as one of the top five evidence-based journals of physiotherapy worldwide, Physiotherapy Canada publishes the results of qualitative and quantitative research including systematic reviews, meta analyses, meta syntheses, public/health policy research, clinical practice guidelines, and case reports.Key messages, clinical commentaries, case studies, evidence-based practice articles, brief reports, and book reviews support knowledge translation to clinical practice.Founded in 1923, Physiotherapy Canada meets the diverse needs of national and international readers and serves as a key repository of inquiries, evidence and advances in the practice of physiotherapy. ObjectifPhysiotherapy Canada est la publication scientifique officielle re ´vise ´e en profondeur de l'Association canadienne de physiothe ´rapie.Son objectif est de fournir des orientations a `l'excellence en sciences et en raisonnement clinique, transmission du savoir, compe ´tences the ´rapeutiques et soins centre ´s sur le patient.Reconnu comme l'un des cinq grands journaux de physiothe ´rapie reposant sur des faits scientifiques dans le monde, Physiotherapy Canada publie les re ´sultats de recherches qualitatives et quantitatives, notamment des revues syste ´matiques, des me ´ta-analyses, des me ´tasynthe `ses, des recherches en politiques de la sante ´ou en politiques publiques, des directives en pratique clinique et des e ´tudes de cas.Ses messages cle ´s, commentaires cliniques, e ´tudes de cas, articles fonde ´s sur des faits scientifiques, re ´sume ´s de discussions et comptes-rendus de livres favorisent la transmission du savoir a `la pratique clinique.Fonde ´e en 1923, Physiotherapy Canada re ´pond aux divers besoins de lecteurs canadiens et e ´trangers et se positionne comme un ve ´ritable recueil sur la recherche, les faits scientifiques et les progre `s dans la pratique de la physiothe ´rapie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it