ELECTROPHYSICAL AGENTS - Contraindications And Precautions: An Evidence-Based Approach To Clinical Decision Making In Physical Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physiotherapy Canada is the official, scholarly, refereed journal of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, giving direction to excellence in clinical science and reasoning, knowledge translation, therapeutic skills and patient-centred care.Recognized as one of the top five evidence-based journals of physiotherapy worldwide, Physiotherapy Canada publishes the results of qualitative and quantitative research including systematic reviews, meta analyses, meta syntheses, public/health policy research, clinical practice guidelines, and case reports.Key messages, clinical commentaries, case studies, evidence-based practice articles, brief reports, and book reviews support knowledge translation to clinical practice.Founded in 1923, Physiotherapy Canada meets the diverse needs of national and international readers and serves as a key repository of inquiries, evidence and advances in the practice of physiotherapy. ObjectifPhysiotherapy Canada est la publication scientifique officielle re ´vise ´e en profondeur de l'Association canadienne de physiothe ´rapie.Son objectif est de fournir des orientations a `l'excellence en sciences et en raisonnement clinique, transmission du savoir, compe ´tences the ´rapeutiques et soins centre ´s sur le patient.Reconnu comme l'un des cinq grands journaux de physiothe ´rapie reposant sur des faits scientifiques dans le monde, Physiotherapy Canada publie les re ´sultats de recherches qualitatives et quantitatives, notamment des revues syste ´matiques, des me ´ta-analyses, des me ´tasynthe `ses, des recherches en politiques de la sante ´ou en politiques publiques, des directives en pratique clinique et des e ´tudes de cas.Ses messages cle ´s, commentaires cliniques, e ´tudes de cas, articles fonde ´s sur des faits scientifiques, re ´sume ´s de discussions et comptes-rendus de livres favorisent la transmission du savoir a `la pratique clinique.Fonde ´e en 1923, Physiotherapy Canada re ´pond aux divers besoins de lecteurs canadiens et e ´trangers et se positionne comme un ve ´ritable recueil sur la recherche, les faits scientifiques et les progre `s dans la pratique de la physiothe ´rapie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.197 | 0.350 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.021 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.023 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".