MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PSMAddition: A phase 3 trial to compare treatment with <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

2022· article· en· W4212864413 on OpenAlexaff
Oliver Sartor, Scott T. Tagawa, Fred Saad, Johann S. de Bono, Felix Y. Feng, Karim Fizazi, Olga V. Sakharova, Michael J. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerClinical endpointAndrogen deprivation therapyOncologyInternal medicineHazard ratioUrologyNuclear medicineRandomized controlled trialCancerConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS210 Background: [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ( 177 Lu-PSMA-617) is a high-affinity prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy that delivers β-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) may alter PSMA expression and radiosensitivity. PSMAddition will assess the efficacy and safety of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in adults with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Methods: PSMAddition ( NCT04720157 ) is an international, prospective, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial in adults with mHSPC. Eligible patients are treatment-naïve or minimally treated candidates for hormonal therapy, with PSMA-positive disease (determined by [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and adequate major organ function. Patients are excluded if they have rapidly progressing tumors that require chemotherapy. Approximately 1126 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq i.v. every 6 weeks, ≤6 cycles) plus SOC or SOC alone (control arm). SOC is ARPI and androgen deprivation therapy. Stratification factors are tumor volume (high/low), age (≥70/ &lt; 70 years) and previous/planned prostatectomy or radiation treatment of the primary prostate tumor (yes/no). The primary endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), as assessed by blinded independent centralized review. Upon centrally confirmed radiographic progression, participants in the control arm can cross over to the 177 Lu-PSMA-617 arm. The planned sample size provides 95% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.7 for rPFS after 418 events with an overall one-sided significance level of 0.025. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival. Other secondary endpoints are the proportion of patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥90% from baseline, time to development of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, composite progression-free survival (radiographic, clinical or PSA progression), safety and tolerability, and health-related quality of life. Previously presented at the 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, FPN 3035, Tagawa S et al. Reused with permission. Clinical trial information: NCT04720157.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207