MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Treatment outcomes for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following progression on upfront androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).

2022· article· en· W4213223108 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Daniel Khalaf, Liheng Chen, Katherine Sunderland, Joanna Vergidis, Krista Noonan, Daygen L. Finch, Muhammad Zulfiqar, Kim N.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsAbbotsford Veterinary ClinicBC Cancer AgencyKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBC Cancer Foundation
KeywordsMedicineEnzalutamideProstate cancerInternal medicineDocetaxelOncologyAndrogen deprivation therapyProportional hazards modelAbiraterone acetateProgression-free survivalCancerChemotherapyAndrogen receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

60 Background: Combined ADT and ARPI is associated with improved overall survival (OS) compared with ADT alone in patients with mCSPC. The activity of subsequent therapies for mCRPC is not well characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled on a biobank at 6 cancer centres in British Columbia, Canada. Patients who received abiraterone or apalutamide for mCSPC were included. Data including baseline clinical prognostic factors and clinical outcomes (per Prostate Cancer Working Group III) were collected from patient records. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log Rank test and prognostic variables were determined using Cox regression. Results: 168 patients were identified of which 126 (75%) received abiraterone, 38 (23%) received apalutamide, and 4 (2%) received one ARPI and switched to the other for toxicity. Median age was 69 years and Gleason score ≥ 8 in 61%. Site of metastasis (mets) at mCSPC was lymph node (n=91), bone (n=141), and liver (n=6). As of August 28 2021, a total of 46 patients progressed to mCRPC, of which 38 received subsequent systemic therapy. First-line mCRPC treatments were docetaxel (n=12), Radium-223 (10), enzalutamide (6), platinum chemotherapy (3), and others (7) including immune checkpoint inhibitors (1) and Lutetium177-PSMA-617 (1) and other investigational agents (5). Outcomes are shown in the table. On univariate Cox analysis, clinical factors at time of mCRPC associated with worse OS were: LDH above upper limit of normal (HR 5.0, 95% CI 1.7-14.5), hemoglobin below lower limit of normal (5.2, 1.1-23.8), presence of ≥ 20 bone mets (3.7, 1.4-9.8), and increasing PSA (1.002, 1.001-1.003). Conclusions: PSA decline rates and survival are modest for patients who have progressed following upfront abiraterone or apalutamide plus ADT for mCSPC. Further follow-up is required to accurately determine outcomes with current mCRPC standard therapies following up-front ADT+ ARPI. Recently approved treatment options such as Lutetium177-PSMA-617 and PARP inhibitors for DNA damage repair deficient tumors may help to improve outcomes for these patients.[Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→