PRECEDENT: A randomized phase II trial comparing EC145 and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in combination, versus PLD alone, in subjects with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LBA5012b Background: EC145, a conjugate of folic acid and desacetylvinblastine hydrazide binds with high affinity to the folate receptor (FR), found on > 90% of epithelial ovarian cancers. This abstract reports interim data on an international randomized, phase II study of EC145 + PLD compared with PLD alone, in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has conducted a prespecified interim analysis on PFS and safety with results reported herein. Methods: Women ≥ 18 with ECOG PS of 0-2 and ≤ 2 prior systemic cytotoxic regimens were randomized to receive EC145 (2.5 mg IV weeks 1 and 3) + PLD (50 mg/m2 IBW IV q 28 days) or PLD (50 mg/m2 IBW IV q 28 days) alone until progression or death. Results: The interim analysis occurred after the 46th event out of a planned study total of 95 progressions or deaths. Demographic characteristics at screening such as age, cancer type, residual tumor after debulking, prior therapy, CA-125 and time from diagnosis were balanced between arms. RECIST mean sum tumor length was longer for the combination arm (122.7 mm vs. 81.3 mm). There was no statistical difference between study arms with regard to total adverse events, serious adverse events, or the number of subjects reporting at least one treatment-emergent drug-related serious adverse event resulting in discontinuation. The Table displays the results of the interim analysis of PFS. At the interim, there is also a trend toward benefit in overall survival for the combination arm with HR = 0.425 (p value of 0.064). Conclusions: Results indicate a greater than doubling in median PFS for women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer receiving EC145 and PLD over those receiving PLD alone. These interim data suggest that EC145 and PLD is the first combination to show a statistically significant delay in progression-free survival over standard therapy in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".