MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213273108 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142911

The LOFAR view of giant, early-type galaxies: Radio emission from active nuclei and star formation

2022· article· en· W4213273108 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. Capetti, M. Brienza, B. Balmaverde, P. N. Best, R. D. Baldi, A. Drabent, G. Gürkan, H. J. A. Röttgering, C. Tasse, B. Webster

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionScience and Technology Facilities CouncilObservatoire de Paris, Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et LettresScience Mission DirectorateDST-NRF Centre Of Excellence In Tree Health BiotechnologySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of EdinburghMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieGauss Centre for SupercomputingEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemMinisterium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-WestfalenDurham UniversityIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftQueen's UniversityNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Central UniversityQueen's University BelfastGordon and Betty Moore FoundationUniversity of HertfordshireBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungLos Alamos National LaboratoryJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversité d'OrléansNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSmithsonian InstitutionScience Foundation IrelandNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLOFARPhysicsAstrophysicsStar formationLuminosityStarsGalaxyAstronomySpectral indexRadio telescopeSpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We studied the properties and the origin of the radio emission in the most luminous, early-type galaxies (ETGs) in the nearby Universe (MK ≤ −25, recession velocity ≤7500 km s−1), as seen by the 150 MHz Low-Frequency ARray (LOFAR) observations. LOFAR images are available for 188 of these giant ETGs (gETGs), and 146 (78%) of them are detected above a typical luminosity of ∼1021 W Hz−1. They show a large spread in power, reaching up to ∼1026 W Hz−1. We confirm a positive link between the stellar luminosity of gETGs and their median radio power, the detection rate, and the fraction of extended sources. About two-thirds (91) of the detected gETGs are unresolved, with sizes ≲4 kpc, confirming the prevalence of compact radio sources in local sources. Forty-six gETGs show extended emission on scales ranging from 4 to 340 kpc, at least 80% of which have a FR I class morphology. Based on the morphology and spectral index of the extended sources, ∼30% of them might be remnant or restarted sources, but further studies are needed to confirm this. Optical spectroscopy (available for 44 gETGs) indicates that for seven gETGs the nuclear gas is ionized by young stars suggesting a contribution to their radio emission from star forming regions. Their radio luminosities correspond to a star formation rate (SFR) in the range 0.1−8 M⊙ yr−1 and a median specific SFR of 0.8 × 10−12 yr−1. The gas flowing toward the center of gETGs can accrete onto the supermassive black hole but also stall at larger radii and form new stars, an indication that feedback does not completely quench star formation. The most luminous gETGs (25 galaxies with MK < −25.8) are all detected at 150 MHz; however, they are not all currently turned on: at least four of them are remnant sources and at least one is likely powered by star formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→