Phylogenomic and comparative genomic analyses of Leuconostocaceae species: identification of molecular signatures specific for the genera Leuconostoc, Fructobacillus and Oenococcus and proposal for a novel genus Periweissella gen. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genera Convivina , Fructobacillus , Leuconostoc , Oenococcus and Weissella , which formed the family Leuconostocaceae , have recently been merged within the family Lactobacillaceae . Using genome sequences for 47 of the 52 named species from these genera, we report here comprehensive phylogenomic and comparative analyses on protein sequences from these species using multiple approaches. In a phylogenomic tree based on concatenated sequences of 498 core proteins from these five genera, and in a 16S rRNA gene tree, members of the genera Fructobacillus , Leuconostoc and Oenococcus formed distinct strongly supported clades. In contrast, Weissella species grouped into two distinct unrelated clades designated as the ‘ Weissella main clade’ and ‘ Weissella clade 2’. The presence of these clades is also seen in a matrix of pairwise average amino acid identity based on core protein sequences. In parallel, comparative genomic studies on protein sequences from Leuconostocaceae genomes have identified 46 conserved signature indels (CSIs) in diverse proteins that are unique characteristics of the different observed species clades. Of these identified CSIs, five, five and 13 CSIs are uniquely present in members of the genera Fructobacillus , Leuconostoc and Oenococcus , respectively. We also report here six and five CSIs that are exclusively present in the species from the Weissella main clade and Weissella clade 2, respectively, providing independent evidence supporting their distinctness from each other. The remaining 12 identified CSIs are commonly shared by some or all of the species from the genera Convivina , Fructobacillus and Leuconostoc , clarifying their interrelationships. The identified CSIs provide novel and reliable means for the identification/circumscription of members of the genera Fructobacillus , Leuconostoc and <j
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".