The plastome of Arctic<i>Oxytropis arctobia</i>(Fabaceae) is significantly different from that of<i>O. splendens</i>and other related species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anatomical and physiological specializations for plant adaptation to harsh climates result from molecular mechanisms that can be encoded in the nucleus or organelle. In this study, the complete plastomes of an arctic species, Oxytropis arctobia Bunge (Fabaceae), and a closely related temperate species, O. splendens Douglas ex Hook., were assembled, annotated, and analyzed to identify differences that might help explain their adaptation to different environments. This is consistent with the previously sequenced O. bicolor DC. and O. glabra plastomes, O. arctobia and O. splendens plastomes both have the common features of the inverted repeat-lacking clade (IRLC), as well as atpF intron loss, which is unique to the genus. However, significant differences were observed between the plastomes of O. arctobia and O. splendens and other closely related species (Oxytropis spp. and Astragalus spp.), including a 3 kb inversion, two large insertions (>1 kb), significant modifications of the accD gene, and an overall larger size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".