MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223489001 · doi:10.1038/s41398-022-01884-3

Genome-wide association analyses of symptom severity among clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

2022· article· en· W4223489001 on OpenAlexafffund
Cynthia Okhuijsen‐Pfeifer, Marte Z. van der Horst, Chad Bousman, Bochao Lin, Kristel R. van Eijk, Stephan Ripke, Yavuz Ayhan, Melih O. Babaoğlu, Maarten Bak, Wouter Alink, Hanneke van Beek, Edwin Beld, Alde Bouhuis, Monika Edlinger, İbrahim Mert Erdoğan, Aygün Ertuğrul, Gökhan Yoca, Ian Everall, Thomas Görlitz, Thérèse van Amelsvoort, Agna A. Bartels‐Velthuis, Richard Bruggeman, Wiepke Cahn, Sinan Gülöksüz, Lieuwe de Haan, R.S. Kahn, Frederike Schirmbeck, Claudia J.P. Simons, Jim van Os, B.Z. Alizadeh, Jurjen J. Luykx, Bart P. F. Rutten, Ruud van Winkel, Koen P. Grootens, Stefan Gutwinski, Tero Hallikainen, Ellen Jeger-Land, Martijn de Koning, Markku Lähteenvuo, Sophie E. Legge, Stefan Leucht, C. Morgenroth, Ahmet Müderrisoğlu, Ankita Narang, Christos Pantelis, Antonio F. Pardiñas, Tatiana Oviedo-Salcedo, Johannes Schneider‐Thoma, Stefanie Schreiter, Eila Repo‐Tiihonen, Heli Tuppurainen, Mike Veereschild, Selene Veerman, M. de Vos, Elias Wagner, Dan Cohen, Jan Bogers, James Walters, A. Elif Anıl Yağcıoğlu, Jari Tiihonen, A. Hasan

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Calgary
FundersMedical Research CouncilAlberta InnovatesAcademy of Medical Sciences
KeywordsSchizophrenia spectrumClozapineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychiatryGenome-wide association studyAssociation (psychology)MedicineClinical psychologyPsychologyPsychosisSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsPsychotherapistGenotypeGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, response is highly variable and possible genetic underpinnings of this variability remain unknown. Here, we performed polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses to estimate the amount of variance in symptom severity among clozapine-treated patients explained by PRSs (R2) and examined the association between symptom severity and genotype-predicted CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 enzyme activity. Genome-wide association (GWA) analyses were performed to explore loci associated with symptom severity. A multicenter cohort of 804 patients (after quality control N = 684) with schizophrenia spectrum disorder treated with clozapine were cross-sectionally assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and/or the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale. GWA and PRS regression analyses were conducted. Genotype-predicted CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 enzyme activities were calculated. Schizophrenia-PRS was most significantly and positively associated with low symptom severity ( p = 1.03 × 10 −3 ; R2 = 1.85). Cross-disorder-PRS was also positively associated with lower CGI-S score ( p = 0.01; R2 = 0.81). Compared to the lowest tertile, patients in the highest schizophrenia-PRS tertile had 1.94 times ( p = 6.84×10 −4 ) increased probability of low symptom severity. Higher genotype-predicted CYP2C19 enzyme activity was independently associated with lower symptom severity ( p = 8.44×10 −3 ). While no locus surpassed the genome-wide significance threshold, rs1923778 within NFIB showed a suggestive association ( p = 3.78×10 −7 ) with symptom severity. We show that high schizophrenia-PRS and genotype-predicted CYP2C19 enzyme activity are independently associated with lower symptom severity among individuals treated with clozapine. Our findings open avenues for future pharmacogenomic projects investigating the potential of PRS and genotype-predicted CYP - activity in schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational PsychiatrySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207