MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224257900 · doi:10.3138/cjpe.70805

Planning the Evaluation of Patient Engagement in the PriCare Research Program

2022· article· en· W4224257900 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alya Danish, Marlène Karam, Véronique Sabourin, Catherine Hudon, Judy L. Porter, Donna Rubenstein, Mike Warren

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Program Evaluation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Logic modelCorporate governanceKey (lock)Health carePsychologyProcess managementKnowledge managementMedical educationSociologyMedicineComputer scienceBusinessPolitical scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The involvement of patients, their families, or their representatives is becoming increasingly common in health-care research. However, theoretical justification of patient engagement (PE) and consistent guidance on how to include patients as key stakeholders on research teams are still lacking. This paper describes how the PriCare group integrates PE into its program’s governance structure and uses a program logic perspective to engage patients in the planning phases of a research study based on resources, processes, and relationships, guided by the SPOR-CIHR’s PE framework. The PriCare approach facilitates the evaluation and continuous improvement of PE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.183
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.140
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1830.140
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.835
GPT teacher head0.638
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainEvaluation
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Program EvaluationSame topicMental Health and Patient InvolvementFrench-language works237,207