Synthetic antibodies block receptor binding and current‐inhibiting effects of α‐cobratoxin from <i>Naja kaouthia</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Each year, thousands of people fall victim to envenomings caused by cobras. These incidents often result in death due to paralysis caused by α-neurotoxins from the three-finger toxin (3FTx) family, which are abundant in elapid venoms. Due to their small size, 3FTxs are among the snake toxins that are most poorly neutralized by current antivenoms, which are based on polyclonal antibodies of equine or ovine origin. While antivenoms have saved countless lives since their development in the late 18th century, an opportunity now exists to improve snakebite envenoming therapy via the application of new biotechnological methods, particularly by developing monoclonal antibodies against poorly neutralized α-neurotoxins. Here, we describe the use of phage-displayed synthetic antibody libraries and the development and characterization of six synthetic antibodies built on a human IgG framework and developed against α-cobratoxin - the most abundant long-chain α-neurotoxin from Naja kaouthia venom. The synthetic antibodies exhibited sub-nanomolar affinities to α-cobratoxin and neutralized the curare-mimetic effect of the toxin in vitro. These results demonstrate that phage display technology based on synthetic repertoires can be used to rapidly develop human antibodies with drug-grade potencies as inhibitors of venom toxins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it