MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225389538 · doi:10.1139/gen-2021-0094

Characterization and expression of the <i>Pirin</i> gene family in <i>Triticum aestivum</i>

2022· article· en· W4225389538 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Sabrina Brunetti, Michelle K. M. Arseneault, Patrick J. Gulick

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyBrachypodium distachyonGene familyGeneArabidopsisGeneticsHordeum vulgareArabidopsis thalianaBrachypodiumAbiotic stressGene expressionAegilops tauschiiGenomeBotanyMutantPoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pirins are nuclear bicupin proteins, encoded by genes that are one of several gene families that comprise the cupin superfamily in plants. Pirin genes have been implicated in stress response pathways studied in Arabidopsis and At- Pirin1 has been shown to interact with the heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunit (GPA1). The aim of this study was to identify the members of the Pirin gene family in Triticum aestivum, to correct their annotations in the whole genome, and gain an insight into their tissue-specific expression as well as their response to abiotic and biotic stresses. The Pirin gene family in T. aestivum is comprised of 18 genes that represent six paralogous gene copies, each having an A, B, and D homeolog. Expression analysis of the Pirin genes in T. aestivum Illumina RNA-seq libraries, which included sampling from differing tissue types as well as abiotic and biotic stresses, indicates that the members of the Pirin gene family have specialized expression and play a role in stress responses. Pirin gene families are also identified in other monocots including Aegilops tauschii, Hordeum vulgare, Brachypodium distachyon, Oryza sativa, Zea mays, Sorghum bicolor, and the dicot Arabidopsis thaliana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsFrench-language works237,207