Reproducibility of Respiratory Chemoreflex Characterization by Modified Rebreathing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modified hypoxic and hyperoxic rebreathing is used to characterize central and peripheral respiratory chemoreflexes in humans. This study examined within‐ and between‐day reproducibility of the key parameters that are identified by this method: ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT) and chemoreflex sensitivity. Seven healthy males (mean ± SD; age: 27±5 years) visited the laboratory on 4 occasions to performrepetitions of modified rebreathing tests in isoxic‐hypoxic (end‐tidal PO2 (PETO2) =50 mmHg) and ‐hyperoxic conditions (PETO2=150 mmHg). Days 1 and 2 consisted of three repeatedhyperoxic and three hypoxic trials, respectively; Days 3 and 4 included both a hyperoxic and a hypoxic trial completed in a counterbalanced order. Ventilation, end‐tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) and PETO2 were measured breath‐by‐breath by pneumotach and dual gas analyser. For each rebreathing trial, the PETCO2 at which ventilation began to rise was identified as the VRT (mmHg) and the slope of the response above VRT provided respiratory chemoreflex sensitivity (L∙min‐1∙mmHg‐1). Within‐ and between‐day reproducibility was assessed by one‐way ANOVA and intraclass correlation (ICC) analyses. The VRT was not different between trials performed on a single day for bothhyperoxic (44±2, 45±3, vs 44±3 mmHg; for Trials 1, 2, vs 3, respectively; p=0.50; ICC=0.926) and hypoxic rebreathing (40±3, 40±4, vs 40±4 mmHg; p=0.66; ICC=0.994). Chemoreflex sensitivity also was not different between trials performed on the same day in hyperoxic (4.3±2.2, 5.0±3.1, vs4.8±2.3 L∙min‐1∙mmHg‐1; p=0.33; ICC=0.955) or hypoxic conditions (5.6±2.2, 6.2±2.7, 5.7±2.0 L∙min‐1∙mmHg‐1; p=0.33; ICC=0.953). Between days, the VRT was not different for hyperoxic rebreathing (44±3 vs 44±2 vs 45±2 mmHg for Days 1, 3, vs 4, respectively; p=0.10; ICC=0.813) but was different for hypoxic rebreathing (40±3 vs 40±2 vs 41±3 mmHg for Days 2‐4, respectively; p=0.01; ICC=0.931). Chemoreflex sensitivity was not different between days for either hyperoxic (4.8±2.5,4.4±2.7, vs 4.9±2.0 L∙min‐1∙mmHg‐1; p=0.01; ICC=0.906) or hypoxic rebreathing (5.8±2.2, 5.8±2.6, vs 7.8±2.8 L∙min‐1∙mmHg‐1; p=0.01; ICC=0.750). Collectively, these data indicate that model parameters derived from hyperoxic and hypoxic modified rebreathing have good‐to‐excellent test‐retest reproducibility when repeated on the same or different days.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".