MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Scleraxis is Required for Induction of GLS1 Expression in Cardiac Myofibroblasts

2022· article· en· W4225418877 on OpenAlexafffund
Sikta Chattopadhyaya, Raghu S. Nagalingam, Pavit Narhan, D. Allison Ledingham, Teri L. Moffatt, Michael P. Czubryt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCardiac fibrosisMyofibroblastGlutaminolysisTransactivationCell biologyGlutaminaseCancer researchTranscription factorBiologyGene knockdownFibrosisChemistryMolecular biologyGlutaminePathologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiac fibrosis is an aberrant wound healing process involving excessive production of extracellular matrix proteins resulting in impaired systolic and diastolic function of the heart, contributing to heart failure and death. Glutaminolysis, which involves conversion of glutamine to glutamate by glutaminase (GLS), and conversion of glutamate to α‐ketoglutarate to fuel oxidative metabolism via the tricarboxylic acid cycle, has been reported as a mechanism for meeting the energy demand required for pulmonary and liver fibrosis however its contribution in cardiac fibrosis is unclear. Although the role of the transcription factor Scleraxis has been established in the phenotypic conversion of cardiac fibroblasts to fibrotic myofibroblasts by our lab, Scleraxis’ role in glutaminolysis remains unelucidated. Our results here show Scleraxis expression was increased by 9 fold and GLS1 by 4 fold when comparing freshly isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts to fibrogenic myofibroblasts. While Scleraxis overexpression increased GLS1 expression 20‐fold, Scleraxis knockdown attenuated GLS1 expression by 76% in cardiac myofibroblasts while cardiac fibroblasts from Scleraxis knockout mice exhibited a 90% loss of GLS1 expression. TGFβ, one of the primary inducers of cardiac fibrosis induces enhanced expression of Scleraxis and has been found to be highly dependent on Scleraxis for many of its downstream effects. TGFβ treatment of activated cardiac fibroblasts from wild type mice doubled the expression of GLS1, but failed to induce GLS1 expression in Scleraxis knockout cells. Via luciferase assay we found a dose‐dependent transactivation of the human GLS1 promoter by Scleraxis in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. While Scleraxis significantly transactivated the hGLS1 promoter, mutation of an E‐Box Scleraxis putative binding site caused 70% attenuation of promoter transactivation. These findings suggest that Scleraxis is sufficient and required to regulate GLS1 expression to facilitate increased energy metabolism during cardiac fibroblast to myofibroblast conversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207