MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231342333 · doi:10.1155/2005/767409

Presidential Posters and Posters of Distinction

2005· article· en· W4231342333 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Alan G. Casson, Paul J. Veugelers, Angela L. Fitzgerald, Geoffrey A. Porter, L Guernsey, Noriko Nakajima, Yoko Itō, Keiko Yokoyama, Shigeaki Mizuno, Kimitoshi Kato, A. Iwasaki, Yasuhiko Arakawa, Noriko Kinukawa, N Nemoto, Eric R. Lacy, Antonio Rollán, Catterina Ferreccio, Paul R. Harris, Carolina Serrano, Alejandro Jara, Alejandro Venegas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAcademic Writing and Publishing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreDalhousie University
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsPresidential systemPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past three decades, incidence rates for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EADC) have increased steadily in North America. We conducted a 2-year prospective case-control study to test the hypothesis that dietary and lifestyle factors contribute to susceptibility for progression to EADC. We also studied patients with the precursor lesion, Barrett's esophagus (BE), and with clinically symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a well recognized risk factor associated with BE and EADC. Between 02/2001 and 02/2003, a total of 431 individuals were enrolled, with informed consent, in a hospital-based case-control study. Cases comprised patients with GERD (n=142), BE (n=130), and EADC (n=57), defined according to stringent clinicopathologic criteria. Controls comprised 102 healthy, strictly defined asymptomatic individuals from the same geographic region. For each participant, a 102-point structured questionnaire was administered, including sociodemographic information, family and medical history, body mass index (BMI), and lifestyle risk factors including tobacco and alcohol consumption, dietary intake and physical activity. The importance of dietary and lifestyle risk factors in GERD, BE and EADC was calculated using multivariate logistic regression. Obesity was independently associated with a significant increased risk for EADC (OR, 4.67; 95% CI,). Diets with high vitamin C content decreased the risk for GERD (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.87), BE (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.98), and EADC (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.77). Multivitamin supplementation additionally reduced the risk of EADC (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.90). For the more established risk factors, we confirmed that smoking was associated with increased risk for EADC (OR, 3.86, 95% CI,, and that increased alcohol (liquor) consumption was a risk factor for GERD (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.05-6.92) and BE (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.23-7.62). We conclude 1) that obesity, cigarette smoking and increased consumption of liquor are significant predictors of risk for progression of GERD and BE to EADC, and 2) that increased dietary vitamin C and multivitamin supplementation may be protective and reduce the risk for progression to EADC in this patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of GastroenterologySame topicAcademic Writing and PublishingFrench-language works237,207