Characterization of the Mechanism of Action of RDR01752, a Novel Corrector of F508del-CFTR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Despite progress in developing pharmacotherapies to rescue F508del-CFTR, the most prevalent Cystic Fibrosis (CF)-causing mutation, individuals homozygous for this mutation still face several disease-related symptoms. Thus, more potent compound combinations are still needed. Here, we investigated the mechanism of action (MoA) of RDR01752, a novel F508del-CFTR trafficking corrector. Experimental approach: F508del-CFTR correction by RDR01752 was assessed by biochemical, immunofluorescence microscopy and functional assays in cell lines and in intestinal organoids. To determine the MoA of RDR01752, we assessed its additive effects to those of genetic revertants of F508del-CFTR, the FDA-approved corrector drugs VX-809 and VX-661, and low temperature. Key Results: Our data demonstrated that RDR01752 rescues F508del-CFTR processing and plasma membrane (PM) expression to similar levels of VX-809 in cell lines, although RDR01752 produced lower functional rescue. However, in functional assays using intestinal organoids (F508del/F508del), RDR01752, VX-809 and VX-661 had similar efficacy. RDR01752 demonstrated additivity to revertants 4RK and G550E, but not to R1070W, as previously shown for VX-809. RDR01752 was also additive to low temperature. Co-treatment of RDR01752 and VX-809 further increased F508del-CFTR function compared to each corrector alone, but not PM expression. Conclusion and Implications: The lack of additivity of RDR01752 with the genetic revertant R1070W suggests that this compound has the same effect as the insertion of tryptophan at 1070, i.e., filling the pocket at the NBD1:ICL4 interface in F508del-CFTR, similarly to VX-809. Combination of RDR01752 with correctors mimicking the rescue by revertants G550E or 4RK could thus maximize rescue of F508del-CFTR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".