MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238349297 · doi:10.1002/9781118981559.ch25

Prenatal Diagnosis of Miscellaneous Biochemical Disorders

2015· other· en· W4238349297 on OpenAlexaff
David S. Rosenblatt, David Watkins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystinosisMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductaseHomocystinuriaPrenatal diagnosisMedicineMaple syrup urine diseaseMalabsorptionPregnancyBiologyGeneticsInternal medicineMethionineBiochemistryCystineGeneFetusEnzymeAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter discusses disorders of folate metabolism and those of cobalamin metabolism, and summarizes advances in the prenatal diagnosis of these disorders. The genes for all of these disorders have been identified, and prenatal diagnosis by molecular genetic analysis is possible when the causal mutations segregating in the family are known. Six genetic disorders affecting folate metabolism are generally recognized: hereditary folate malabsorption, cerebral folate deficiency, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency, glutamate formiminotransferase deficiency, dihydrofolate reductase deficiency, and MTHFD1 deficiency. All of the inborn errors affecting folate metabolism are inherited as autosomal recessive traits. The chapter considers the disorders that affect activity of methionine synthase (cblE and cblG), which uses 5-methyltetrahydrofolate as a methyl donor. Cystinosis can be diagnosed by examining the cystine content of cultured fibroblasts or leukocytes. Treatment in cystinosis includes the management of the renal disease and dialysis or transplantation after end-stage renal disease develops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiomedical Research and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207