O4‐01‐03: AMYLOID‐B AND HYPERPHOSPHORYLATED TAU SYNERGY DRIVES CLINICAL PROGRESSION TO ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conceptual framework suggests that the synergism between amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) aggregates determines structural and functional abnormalities in cognitively normal individuals. Our study was designed to test the hypothesis that clinical progression to Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is dependent on the synergism between Aβ and p-tau rather than merely additive effects of overlapping brain pathologies. We categorized 310 ADNI participants with amnestic MCI in four biomarker groups based on elevated or non-elevated Aβ positron emission tomography (PET) using [F]Florbetapir ligand and cerebrospinal fluid p-tau biomarkers (Table 1). Clinical and neuropsychological evaluations were performed at baseline and at 2 years including memory, executive function, psychomotor speed processing, and language. Regression interaction models evaluated changes in cognition and clinical status as a function of baseline imaging and fluid biomarkers. Using Voxel-Stats, we built a voxel-based logistic regression model in order to test the association between Aβ PET at every voxel and p-tau status as determinant of progression to dementia, assuming the probability of progression as p’: Log p’ / 1-p’ = β0 + β1(florbetapir SUVR) + β2(CSF p-tau status) + β3(florbetapir SUVR*p-tau status) + covariates + error. All models were adjusted for age, gender, education, APOE ε4 status and corrected for multiple comparison testing using Bonferroni at P < 0.05. We found that Aβ+/p-tau+ individuals had the highest rate of clinical and neuropsychological decline in all cognitive domains as compared to Aβ+/p-tau−, Aβ−/p-tau+ and Aβ−/p-tau−, which did not differ from one another. Notably, regression interaction models confirmed that the synergistic effect between Aβ and p-tau abnormalities best-predicted cognitive decline and clinical progression to dementia, as compared to the sum of their independent effects. Finally, voxel-based logistic regression analysis revealed that the lateral and basal temporal and inferior parietal cortices were the brain regions where the synergistic effect between Aβ and p-tau status determined an increased likelihood of progression to dementia (Figure 1). Together, the present results suggest that clinical progression to AD is driven by a synergistic rather than a merely additive effect between Aβ aggregation and tau hyperphosphorylation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".