MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256577831 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.12173640

Epitaxial GaN using Ga(NMe2)3 and NH3 Plasma by Atomic Layer Deposition

2020· preprint· en· W4256577831 on OpenAlexaff
Polla Rouf, Nathan J. O’Brien, Sydney C. Buttera, Ivan Martinović, Babak Bakhit, Erik Martinsson, Justinas Pališaitis, Chih‐Wei Hsu, Henrik Pedersen

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseVetenskapsrådetStiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
KeywordsAtomic layer depositionEpitaxyChemical vapor depositionMaterials scienceGalliumLayer (electronics)Deposition (geology)NanotechnologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryMetallurgyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div>Low temperature deposition of high-quality epitaxial GaN is crucial for its integration in</div><div>electronic applications. Chemical vapor deposition at approximately 800 °C using SiC with an</div><div>AlN buffer layer or nitridized sapphire as substrates is used to facilitate the GaN growth. Here,</div><div>we present a low temperature atomic layer deposition (ALD) process using</div><div>tris(dimethylamido)gallium(III) with NH3 plasma. The ALD process shows self-limiting</div><div>behaviour between 130-250 °C with a growth rate of 1.4 Å/cycle. The GaN films produced were</div><div>crystalline on Si(100) at all deposition temperatures with a near stochiometric Ga/N ratio with</div><div>low carbon and oxygen impurities. When GaN was deposited on 4H-SiC, the films grew</div><div>epitaxially without the need for an AlN buffer layer, which has never been reported before. The bandgap of the GaN films was measured to be ~3.42 eV and the fermi level showed that the GaN was unintentionally n-type doped. This study shows the potential of ALD for GaN-based</div><div>electronic devices.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207