MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280612854 · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.807202

The Contribution of HCN Channelopathies in Different Epileptic Syndromes, Mechanisms, Modulators, and Potential Treatment Targets: A Systematic Review

2022· review· en· W4280612854 on OpenAlexaff
Miriam Kessi, Jing Peng, Haolin Duan, Hailan He, Baiyu Chen, Juan Xiong, Ying Wang, Lifen Yang, Guoli Wang, Karlmax Kiprotich, Olumuyiwa A. Bamgbade, Fang He, Fei Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEpilepsyChannelopathyNeurosciencePhenotypePostsynaptic potentialMedicineInhibitory postsynaptic potentialEpilepsy syndromesBioinformaticsBiologyInternal medicineGeneticsGeneReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) current reduces dendritic summation, suppresses dendritic calcium spikes, and enables inhibitory GABA-mediated postsynaptic potentials, thereby suppressing epilepsy. However, it is unclear whether increased HCN current can produce epilepsy. We hypothesized that gain-of-function (GOF) and loss-of-function (LOF) variants of HCN channel genes may cause epilepsy. Objectives This systematic review aims to summarize the role of HCN channelopathies in epilepsy, update genetic findings in patients, create genotype–phenotype correlations, and discuss animal models, GOF and LOF mechanisms, and potential treatment targets. Methods The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, for all years until August 2021. Results We identified pathogenic variants of HCN1 ( n = 24), HCN2 ( n = 8), HCN3 ( n = 2), and HCN4 ( n = 6) that were associated with epilepsy in 74 cases (43 HCN1 , 20 HCN2 , 2 HCN3 , and 9 HCN4 ). Epilepsy was associated with GOF and LOF variants, and the mechanisms were indeterminate. Less than half of the cases became seizure-free and some developed drug-resistant epilepsy. Of the 74 cases, 12 (16.2%) died, comprising HCN1 ( n = 4), HCN2 ( n = 2), HCN3 ( n = 2), and HCN4 ( n = 4). Of the deceased cases, 10 (83%) had a sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and 2 (16.7%) due to cardiopulmonary failure. SUDEP affected more adults ( n = 10) than children ( n = 2). HCN1 variants p.M234R, p.C329S, p.V414M, p.M153I, and p.M305L, as well as HCN2 variants p.S632W and delPPP (p.719–721), were associated with different phenotypes. HCN1 p.L157V and HCN4 p.R550C were associated with genetic generalized epilepsy. There are several HCN animal models, pharmacological targets, and modulators, but precise drugs have not been developed. Currently, there are no HCN channel openers. Conclusion We recommend clinicians to include HCN genes in epilepsy gene panels. Researchers should explore the possible underlying mechanisms for GOF and LOF variants by identifying the specific neuronal subtypes and neuroanatomical locations of each identified pathogenic variant. Researchers should identify specific HCN channel openers and blockers with high binding affinity. Such information will give clarity to the involvement of HCN channelopathies in epilepsy and provide the opportunity to develop targeted treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Molecular NeuroscienceSame topicIon channel regulation and functionFrench-language works237,207