MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281294278 · doi:10.1101/2022.05.20.492862

Lysogenized phages of methanotrophic bacteria show a broad and untapped genetic diversity

2022· preprint· en· W4281294278 on OpenAlexaff
Miranda Stahn, Aurelija Grigonyte, Fabini D. Orata, David A. Collins, Liam Rieder, Marina Kalyuzhnaya, Andrew Millard, Lisa Y. Stein, Dominic Sauvageau

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProphageBiologyMethanotrophBacteriaBioplasticMicrobial ecologyMicrobiologyThermophileGeneticsBacteriophageEcologyGeneEscherichia coliAnaerobic oxidation of methaneMethane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Methanotrophs are a unique class of bacteria with the ability to metabolize single-carbon compounds such as methane. They play an important role in the global methane cycle and have great potential as industrial platforms for the bioconversion of methane from industrial waste streams into valuable products, such as biofuels and bioplastics. However, many aspects of methanotroph biology have yet to be elucidated, including the prevalence and impact of lysogenized bacteriophages (phages), which can greatly affect both the ecology and the industrial performance of these bacteria. The present study investigates the presence of putative prophages in three gammaproteobacterial ( Methylobacter marinus A45, Methylomicrobium album BG8, Methylomonas denitrificans FJG1) and two alphaproteobacterial ( Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, Methylocystis sp. Rockwell) methanotrophs using four programs predicting putative phage sequences (PhageBoost, PHASTER, Phigaro, and Island Viewer). Mitomycin C was used to trigger induction of prophages, which was monitored through infection dynamics. Successfully induced phages from M. marinus A45 (MirA1, MirA2), M. album BG8 (MirB1), and M. trichosporium OB3b (MirO1) were isolated and characterized using transmission electron microscopy. Subsequently, bioinformatic analyses (BLAST and phylogenetics) were performed on three induced phages to obtain a profile of their respective genetic makeup. Their broad diversity and differences from previously known phages, based on whole genome and structural gene sequences, suggest they each represent a new phage family, genus and species: “ Britesideviridae Inducovirus miraone ”, “ Patronusviridae Enigmavirus miratwo ”, and “ Kainiviridae Tripudiumvirus miroone ” represented by isolates MirA1, MirA2, and MirO1, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBacteriophages and microbial interactions→French-language works237,207→