MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281698329 · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.2c02623

Discovery and Identification of Tastants and Taste-Modulating <i>N</i>-Acyl Amino Acid Derivatives in Traditional Korean Fermented Dish Kimchi Using a Sensomics Approach

2022· article· en· W4281698329 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Peter Christa, Andreas Dunkel, Alin Krauss, Timo D. Stark, Corinna Dawid, Thomas Hofmann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSCIEX
KeywordsUmamiTasteChemistryFermentationChromatographyAmino acidFermentation in food processingFood scienceLactic acidBiochemistryBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensory-guided fractionation by means of ultrafiltration and gel permeation chromatography followed by high-performance liquid chromatography, synthesis, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) quantitation, and taste re-engineering experiments revealed taste-active and taste-enhancing compounds contributing to the umami, mouthful and complex taste profile of the fermented Korean dish, kimchi. Besides basic taste-active compounds, in particular, various N-acylated amino acids deriving from succinic acid and lactic acid imparted taste-modulating properties in food matrices. Taste threshold concentrations were determined to evaluate intrinsic and modulating effects. Quantitation of N-acylated amino acids in kimchi following synthesis revealed the presence of numerous derivatives showing taste–active properties. Sensory evaluation including recombination and partial addition experiments highlighted that both the N-lactoyl- and the N-succinoyl amino acid derivatives contribute to increasing the fullness, volume, and complexity of food matrices, whereas the latter directly contributes to the overall taste of kimchi in natural concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207