ARMC5 is part of an RPB1-specific ubiquitin ligase implicated in adrenal hyperplasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ARMC5 is implicated in several pathological conditions, but its function remains unknown. We have previously identified CUL3 and RPB1 (the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) as potential ARMC5-interacting proteins. Here, we show that ARMC5, CUL3 and RBX1 form an active E3 ligase complex specific for RPB1. ARMC5, CUL3, and RBX1 formed an active E3 specific for RPB1. Armc5 deletion caused a significant reduction in RPB1 ubiquitination and an increase in an accumulation of RPB1, and hence an enlarged Pol II pool in normal tissues and organs. The compromised RPB1 degradation did not cause generalized Pol II stalling nor depressed transcription in the adrenal glands but did result in dysregulation of a subset of genes, with most upregulated. We found RPB1 to be highly expressed in the adrenal nodules from patients with primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (PBMAH) harboring germline ARMC5 mutations. Mutant ARMC5 had altered binding with RPB1. In summary, we discovered that wildtype ARMC5 was part of a novel RPB1-specific E3. ARMC5 mutations resulted in an enlarged Pol II pool, which dysregulated a subset of effector genes. Such an enlarged Pol II pool and gene dysregulation was correlated to adrenal hyperplasia in humans and KO mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".