MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283014765 · doi:10.1080/03610470.2022.2065453

Physicochemical Properties and Malting Potential of New Canadian Hulless Barley Genotypes

2022· article· en· W4283014765 on OpenAlex
Marta S. Izydorczyk, Ana Badea, Aaron D. Beattie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarchFood scienceArabinoxylanHydrolysisFriabilityChemistryBiochemistryMetabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interest in malting hulless barley (HB) is driven by its potential to produce very high levels of malt extract, but elevated levels of wort ß-glucan and insufficient levels of enzymes in hulless malt have prevented its widespread use. The objective of this study was to highlight the recent advancements in quality improvement of Canadian HB for malting purposes. Five advanced HB lines were evaluated for various barley and malt quality characteristics. All hulless lines exhibited lower grain hardness and slightly lower kernel weight and diameter compared to AAC Synergy (a popular two-rowed covered Canadian variety). The average total starch content of the hulless barley lines (64.2%) was significantly higher than AAC Synergy (59.9%) but slightly lower than that of CDC Clear (65.1%). Despite the low friability values, HB malts had a crumbly texture with good solubility and enzyme accessibility resulting in ample production of fermentable sugars. The average chain length of starch hydrolysis products in wort of new HB lines was similar to that of AAC Synergy, indicating sufficient enzyme activities and a highly effective hydrolysis. The fine-grind extract levels from hulless malt were on average 8% higher than from AAC Synergy, and several new HB lines exceeded the level of CDC Clear extract by 0.7–1.0%. Compared to CDC Clear, the new HB lines showed a significant reduction in concentration of wort ß-glucans. The concentration and the average degree of polymerization of arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides in wort of HB lines were generally higher than in wort of AAC Synergy, partly explaining the higher viscosity of HB worts. In general, the recently developed HB lines exhibited excellent malting potential with significant improvements in the levels of malt enzymes, concentration of free amino nitrogen compounds, and β-glucans in wort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it