Phylogenomic Analyses and Molecular Signatures Elucidating the Evolutionary Relationships amongst the Chlorobia and Ignavibacteria Species: Robust Demarcation of Two Family-Level Clades within the Order Chlorobiales and Proposal for the Family Chloroherpetonaceae fam. nov
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evolutionary relationships amongst Chlorobia and Ignavibacteria species/strains were examined using phylogenomic and comparative analyses of genome sequences. In a phylogenomic tree based on 282 conserved proteins, the named Chlorobia species formed a monophyletic clade containing two distinct subclades. One clade, encompassing the genera Chlorobaculum, Chlorobium, Pelodictyon, and Prosthecochloris, corresponds to the family Chlorobiaceae, whereas another clade, harboring Chloroherpeton thalassium, Candidatus Thermochlorobacter aerophilum, Candidatus Thermochlorobacteriaceae bacterium GBChlB, and Chlorobium sp. 445, is now proposed as a new family (Chloroherpetonaceae fam. nov). In parallel, our comparative genomic analyses have identified 47 conserved signature indels (CSIs) in diverse proteins that are exclusively present in members of the class Chlorobia or its two families, providing reliable means for identification. Two known Ignavibacteria species in our phylogenomic tree are found to group within a larger clade containing several Candidatus species and uncultured Chlorobi strains. A CSI in the SecY protein is uniquely shared by the species/strains from this “larger Ignavibacteria clade”. Two additional CSIs, which are commonly shared by Chlorobia species and the “larger Ignavibacteria clade”, support a specific relationship between these two groups. The newly identified molecular markers provide novel tools for genetic and biochemical studies and identification of these organisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".