MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283798787 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.068

CORE-IBD: A Multidisciplinary International Consensus Initiative to Develop a Core Outcome Set for Randomized Controlled Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2022· article· en· W4283798787 on OpenAlexafffund
Christopher Ma, Jurij Hanžel, Remo Panaccione, William J. Sandborn, Geert D’Haens, Vineet Ahuja, Raja Atreya, Çharles N. Bernstein, Peter Bossuyt, Brian Bressler, Robert V. Bryant, Benjamin L. Cohen, Jean‐Frédéric Colombel, Silvio Danese, Axel Dignaß, Marla C. Dubinsky, Phillip Fleshner, Richard B. Gearry, Stephen B. Hanauer, Ailsa Hart, Paulo Gustavo Kotze, Torsten Kucharzik, Péter L. Lakatos, Rupert W. Leong, Fernando Magro, Julián Panés, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Zhihua Ran, Miguel Regueiro, Siddharth Singh, Antonino Spinelli, A. Hillary Steinhart, Simon Travis, C. Janneke van der Woude, Bruce Yacyshyn, Takayuki Yamamoto, Matthieu Allez, Willem A. Bemelman, Amy L. Lightner, Édouard Louis, David T. Rubin, Ellen Scherl, Corey A. Siegel, Mark S. Silverberg, Séverine Vermeire, Claire E. Parker, Stefanie C. McFarlane, Leonardo Guizzetti, Michelle I. Smith, Niels Vande Casteele, Brian G. Feagan, Vipul Jairath

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai HospitalSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryMcGill UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTakeda CanadaPfizer CanadaShireGenentechPrometheus BiosciencesBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaProtagonist TherapeuticsJanssen PharmaceuticalsGilead SciencesAbbVie CanadaSeres TherapeuticsJanssen CanadaAmgen CanadaSanofiRocheGlaxoSmithKlinePfizer
KeywordsMedicineCalprotectinRandomized controlled trialCrohn's diseaseUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseClinical trialInternal medicineClinical endpointMultidisciplinary approachDelphi methodOutcomes researchPatient-reported outcomeDiseasePhysical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)Alternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.521
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.528
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5210.528
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0290.024
Bibliometrics0.0150.012
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0150.007
Open science0.0140.022
Research integrity0.0120.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207