MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285123254 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2022.3175989

ARIES: Cylindrical Pendulum Actuated Explorer Sphere

2022· article· en· W4285123254 on OpenAlexafffund
Bruno Belzile, David St-Onge

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsPayload (computing)ActuatorKinematicsRobotComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Inverted pendulumStewart platformSpherical shellControl theory (sociology)SimulationAerospace engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsShell (structure)Artificial intelligenceClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spherical rolling robots (SRR) have been a promising avenue for the exploration of unstructured environments with variable topologies. The advantages include the ability to move fast, robustness to collision, and a lower number of actuators. However, to finally be used in real missions and applications, they need to have a high maneuverability and have sufficient inner space to house a proper payload for the intended application, such as cave and tunnel exploration, without compromising on the performances. With barycentric spherical robot, adding mass with a payload may become challenging, as the location of the center-of-mass is critical for the locomotion. In this article, we propose a novel barycentric spherical robot with two degrees-of-freedom (DoF) named Autonomous Robotic Intelligent Explorer Spheres (ARIES). The motion of this SRR is generated by a cylindrical actuated joint acting like a 2-DoF pendulum. This design allows us to have a nearly empty upper hemisphere inside the spherical shell, which is dedicated to payloads adapted to the application. The full kinematics and dynamics are presented, and simulation results are included. The control scheme implemented is detailed. We conducted an experimental evaluation of the ARIES with different trajectories, as well as discussed practical considerations and future improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207