MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285169761 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4151495

The Super 2022 Guideline for Reporting of Surgical Technique

2022· article· en· W4285169761 on OpenAlexaff
Kaiping Zhang, Yanfang Ma, Jinlin Wu, Qianling Shi, Leandro Cardoso Barchi, Marco Scarci, René Horsleben Petersen, Calvin S.H. Ng, Steven N. Hochwald, Ryuichi Waseda, Fabio Davoli, Robert Fruscio, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Michel González, Benjamin Wei, Guillaume Piessen, Jianfei Shen, Xianzhuo Zhang, Panpan Jiao, Yulong He, Nuria Novoa, Benedetta Bedetti, Sébastien Gilbert, Alan Sihoe, Alper Toker, Alfonso Fiorelli, Marcelo F. Jiménez, Aung Oo, Grace S. Li, Xueqin Tang, Yawen Lu, Hussein Elkhayat, Tomaž Štupnik, Tanel Laisaar, Firas Abu Akar, Diego González-Rivas, Zhanhao Su, Bin Qiu, Stephen D. Wang, Yaolong Chen, Shugeng Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineMedicineMedical physicsAccountingBusinessPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.055
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.205
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0550.205
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0110.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0130.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic Journal→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→