MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285776415 · doi:10.24875/acme.m19000030

Authorship: From credit to accountability – Reflections from the Editors’ network

2019· review· es· W4285776415 on OpenAlexaff
Fernándo Alfonso, Parounak Zelveian, Jean-Jacques Monsuez, Michael Aschermann, Michael Böehm, Alfonso Buendía-Hernández, Tzung‐Dau Wang, Ariel Cohen, Sebija Izetbegović, Anton Doubell, Darío Echeverri, Nuray Enç, Ignacio Ferreira‐González, Anetta Undas, Ulrike Fortmüller, Plamen Gatzov, Carmen Ginghină, Lino Gonçalves, Faouzi Addad, Mahmoud Hassanein, Gerd Heusch, Kurt Huber, Róbert Hatala, Mario Ivanuša, Chu-Pak Lau, Germanas Marinskis, Livio Dei-Cas, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte, Kjell Nikus, Eckart Fleck, Luc Piérard, Slobodan Obradović, María del P. Aguilar-Passano, Yangsoo Jang, Olaf Rødevand, Mikael Sander, Е. V. Shlyakhto, Çetin Erol, Dimitris Tousoulis, Dilek Ural, Jan J. Piek, Albert Varga, Andreas J. Flammer François Mach, Alban Dibra, Faiq Guliyev, Alexander Mrochek, Mamanti Rogava, Ismael Guzmán-Melgar, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Kanat Kabdrakhmanov, Laila Haddour, Zlatko Fras, Claes Held, Valentyn Shumakov

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivos de cardiolog�a de M�xico (English ed Internet) · 2019
Typereview
Languagees
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Canadian institutionsCanadian Journal of Communication (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceMedical journalPhilosophyLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

to improve the scientific

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.146
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.284
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1460.284
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.016
Scholarly communication0.0230.034
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0170.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.416
GPT teacher head0.540
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainIncentives
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivos de cardiolog�a de M�xico (English ed Internet)Same topicPharmaceutical industry and healthcareFrench-language works237,207