Malarial Antibody Detection with an Engineered Yeast Agglutination Assay
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malaria, a disease caused by the Plasmodium parasite carried by Anopheles mosquitoes, is commonly diagnosed by microscopy of peripheral blood smears and with rapid diagnostic tests. Both methods show limited detection of low parasitemia that may maintain transmission and hinder malaria elimination. We have developed a novel agglutination assay in which modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells act as antigen-displaying bead-like particles to capture malaria antibodies. The Epidermal Growth Factor-1 like domain (EGF1) of the Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 (PfMSP-119) was displayed on the yeast surface and shown to be capable of binding antimalaria antibodies. Mixed with a second yeast strain displaying the Z domain of Protein A from Staphylococcus aureus and allowed to settle in a round-bottomed well, the yeast produce a visually distinctive agglutination test result: a tight “button” at a low level of malarial antibodies, and a diffuse “sheet” when higher antibody levels are present. Positive agglutination results were observed in malaria-positive human serum to a serum dilution of 1:100 to 1:125. Since the yeast cells are inexpensive to produce, the test may be amenable to local production in regions seeking malaria surveillance information to guide their elimination programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it