Clinical outcomes associated with azacitidine (AZA) monotherapy for treatment-naïve, higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS): A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e19062 Background: AZA is a standard of care for patients who have HR-MDS. Given the limited availability of large datasets describing outcomes in the current treatment paradigm of HR-MDS, this analysis aimed to aggregate clinical outcomes associated with AZA monotherapy for treatment-naïve HR-MDS. Methods: CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched to identify interventional, prospective, and retrospective observational studies in treatment-naïve HR-MDS (defined as intermediate-2 or high risk by IPSS or intermediate to very high risk by IPSS-R) using AZA monotherapy. Inclusion of observational studies was limited to those with n >20 in the AZA arm. Responses according to IWG 2000 or IWG 2006 including complete remission (CR) rate, overall response rate (ORR; defined as CR, marrow CR [mCR], partial response, and hematologic improvement), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and time to response (TTR) were extracted. Response rates were synthesized using random-effects models; median of medians was used for OS, DOR, and TTR. Results: Of 3250 abstracts identified, 34 publications describing 16 studies met inclusion criteria: 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 3 prospective studies, and 8 retrospective studies. None of the response endpoints were reported in all studies (see Table). The pooled ORR ranged from 44% to 55% across RCTs, prospective, and retrospective studies. The pooled CR rates, reported in 2 RCTs (n=55), 1 prospective study (n=27), and 3 retrospective studies (n=509), were 14%, 11%, and 16%, respectively. The pooled CR rate across all studies (n=591) was 16% (95% CI: 13%, 19%). Pooled median OS (mOS) was 16.7 months (mo) in the 3 RCTs (n=161), 16.5 mo in a single prospective study (n=34), and 14.4 mo in the 5 retrospective studies (n=1472). Pooled mOS across all studies (n=1667) was 16.4 mo (95% CI: 12.0, 17.3). The pooled median DOR was 10.1 mo (95% CI: 9.1, 11.0), and the median TTR was 4.6 mo (95% CI: 3.0, 9.0). Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that benefit from AZA monotherapy in treatment-naïve HR-MDS patients is limited. Opportunity exists for novel therapies to increase response rates, improve the duration of responses, and prolong survival. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.028 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".