MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288045904 · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.07.017

Translating results from the cardiovascular outcomes trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists into clinical practice: Recommendations from a Eastern and Southern Europe diabetes expert group

2022· article· en· W4288045904 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrej Janež, Emir Muzurović, Anca Pantea Stoian, Martin Haluzı́k, Cristian Guja, Leszek Czupryniak, Lea Duvnjak, Nebojša Lalić, Tsvetalina Tankova, Paweł Bogdański, Νικόλαος Παπάνας, Josè Silva Nunes, Péter Kempler, Zlatko Fras, Manfredi Rizzo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cardiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBausch HealthMylanKowa CompanyNovo NordiskSanofiAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyServierAmgen
KeywordsMedicineLiraglutideDulaglutideSemaglutideGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorIncretinGlucagon-like peptide-1Type 2 Diabetes MellitusInternal medicineClinical trialType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusExenatideEndocrinologyReceptorAgonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.354
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.533
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3540.533
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.012
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0220.011
Open science0.0150.010
Research integrity0.0230.031
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of CardiologySame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207