CD109 Is a Critical Determinant of EGFR Expression and Signaling, and Tumorigenicity in Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Background: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. CD109 is overexpressed in many cancers including SCC. Although a pro-tumorigenic role for CD109 has been shown in non-SCC cancers, and in one type of SCC, the mechanisms and signaling pathways reported are discrepant. (2) Methods: The CD109-EGFR interaction and CD109-mediated regulation of EGFR expression, signaling, and stemness were studied using microarray, immunoblot, immunoprecipitation, qPCR, immunofluorescence, and/or spheroid formation assays. The role of CD109 in tumor progression and metastasis was studied using xenograft tumor growth and metastatic models. (3) Results: We establish the in vivo tumorigenicity of CD109 in vulvar SCC cells and demonstrate that CD109 is an essential regulator of EGFR expression at the mRNA and protein levels and of EGFR/AKT signaling in vulvar and hypopharyngeal SCC cells. Furthermore, we show that the mechanism involves EGFR-CD109 heteromerization and colocalization, leading to the stabilization of EGFR levels. Additionally, we demonstrate that the maintenance of epithelial morphology and in vitro tumorigenicity of SCC cells require CD109 localization to the cell surface. (4) Conclusions: Our study identifies an essential role for CD109 in vulvar SCC progression. We demonstrate that CD109 regulates SCC cellular stemness and epithelial morphology via a cell-surface CD109-EGFR interaction, stabilization of EGFR levels and EGFR/AKT signaling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".