Design and Performance Analysis of a Picosecond Pulse Generator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A picosecond pulse generator is designed to generate a stable differentiated Gaussian (monocycle) waveform. The design approach to increasing the center frequency, bandwidth and peak-to-peak voltage, as compared to previously reported ultra-wideband (UWB) generators, is described. The 280 ps wide pulse achieves a 1:10 fractional bandwidth (FBW) ratio extending from 500 MHz to beyond 5 GHz at the -10 dB level. A measurement procedure is proposed for evaluating the jitter and noise performance of UWB pulse generators, and it is applied to the fabricated prototype. The procedure exploits jitter and noise definitions from high-speed digital electronics, which are adapted here for the jitter and noise evaluation of UWB pulse generators at microwave frequencies. The problems in obtaining the absolute and relative jitter of a UWB generator are discussed along with proposed solutions. The impact of the input trigger on the pulse stability is demonstrated through the dramatic improvement achieved by the integration of a jitter cleaner in the generator’s circuit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".