Detection of emerging neurodegeneration using Bayesian linear mixed-effect modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early detection of neurodegeneration, and prediction of when neurodegenerative diseases will lead to symptoms, are critical for developing and initiating disease modifying treatments for these disorders. While each neurodegenerative disease has a typical pattern of early changes in the brain, these disorders are heterogeneous, and early manifestations can vary greatly across people. Methods for detecting emerging neurodegeneration in any part of the brain are therefore needed. Prior publications have described the use of Bayesian linear mixed-effects (BLME) modeling for characterizing the trajectory of change across the brain in healthy controls and patients with neurodegenerative disease. Here, we use an extension of such a model to detect emerging neurodegeneration in cognitively healthy individuals at risk for dementia. We use BLME to quantify individualized rates of volume loss across the cerebral cortex from the first two MRIs in each person and then extend the BLME model to predict future values for each voxel. We then compare observed values at subsequent time points with the values that were expected from the initial rates of change and identify voxels that are lower than the expected values, indicating accelerated volume loss and neurodegeneration. We apply the model to longitudinal imaging data from cognitively normal participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), some of whom subsequently developed dementia, and two cognitively normal cases who developed pathology-proven frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). These analyses identified regions of accelerated volume loss prior to or accompanying the earliest symptoms, and expanding across the brain over time, in all cases. The changes were detected in regions that are typical for the likely diseases affecting each patient, including medial temporal regions in patients at risk for Alzheimer's disease, and insular, frontal, and/or anterior/inferior temporal regions in patients with likely or proven FTLD. In the cases where detailed histories were available, the first regions identified were consistent with early symptoms. Furthermore, survival analysis in the ADNI cases demonstrated that the rate of spread of accelerated volume loss across the brain was a statistically significant predictor of time to conversion to dementia. This method for detection of neurodegeneration is a potentially promising approach for identifying early changes due to a variety of diseases, without prior assumptions about what regions are most likely to be affected first in an individual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".