MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290994344 · doi:10.1200/jco.22.00597

Smart Start: Rituximab, Lenalidomide, and Ibrutinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Large B-Cell Lymphoma

2022· article· en· W4290994344 on OpenAlexaff
Jason R. Westin, R. Eric Davis, Lei Feng, Fredrick B. Hagemeister, Raphaël Steiner, Hun Ju Lee, Luis Fayad, Loretta J. Nastoupil, Sairah Ahmed, Maria Alma Rodriguez, Michelle A. Fanale, Felipe Samaniego, Swaminathan P. Iyer, Ranjit Nair, Yasuhiro Oki, Nathan Fowler, Michael Wang, Man Chun John, Francisco Vega, Timothy J. McDonnell, Chelsea C. Pinnix, Donna Griffith, Yang Lü, Sanjit O. Tewari, Ryan Sun, David W. Scott, Christopher R. Flowers, Sattva S. Neelapu, Michael R. Green

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BC
FundersJanssen BiotechNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterNational Institutes of HealthGenentechJanssen Scientific AffairsKaryopharm TherapeuticsConquer Cancer FoundationGilead SciencesSanofiMorphoSysCelgeneAstraZenecaBristol-Myers SquibbAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyGlaxoSmithKlineAmgen
KeywordsMedicineLenalidomideIbrutinibRituximabChemoimmunotherapyInternal medicineChemotherapyDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaOncologyInternational Prognostic IndexSurgeryLymphomaGastroenterologyMultiple myelomaLeukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE Chemoimmunotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is largely unchanged for decades. Both preclinical models and clinical data suggest the combination of lenalidomide and ibrutinib may have synergy in DLBCL, particularly in the non–germinal center B-cell-like subset. METHODS We enrolled 60 patients with newly diagnosed non–germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL in this investigator-initiated, single-arm phase II trial of rituximab, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib (RLI) with the sequential addition of chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02636322 ). Patients were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenous once on day 1, lenalidomide 25 mg once per day on days 1-10, and ibrutinib 560 mg once daily continuously of each 21-day cycle (RLI). After two cycles, standard chemotherapy was added to RLI for six additional cycles. The primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) after two cycles of RLI alone and complete response rate after completion of RLI with chemotherapy. In evaluable samples, circulating tumor DNA and DLBCL90 assays were performed. RESULTS The median age was 63.5 years (range, 29-83 years) with 28% age 70 years or older. The revised international prognostic index identified 42% as high risk, and 62% were double expressor of MYC and BCL2 protein. The ORR after two cycles of RLI was 86.2%, and the complete response rate at the end of RLI-chemotherapy was 94.5%. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the progression-free survival and overall survival were at 91.3% and 96.6% at 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSION Smart Start is the first study, to our knowledge, to treat newly diagnosed DLBCL with a targeted therapy combination before chemotherapy. RLI produced a high ORR, and RLI with chemotherapy resulted in durable responses. This establishes the potential for developing biologically driven and noncytotoxic first-line therapies for DLBCL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207