MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293073857 · doi:10.2337/db22-183-or

183-OR: Overcoming Immunological Barriers for “Off-the-Shelf” iPSC-Derived Islets

2022· article· en· W4293073857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
XIAOMENG HU, Kathy White, Ari G. Olroyd, ROWENA DEJESUS, ANTONIA DOMINGUEZ, William E. Dowdle, ELAINE Y.L. CHU, ANNABELLE FRIERA, Chi Young, FRANK WELLS, TREVOR MCGILL, MICHAEL RUKSTALIS, Corie Gattis, RONALD BASCO, Jeffrey R. Millman, Sonja Schrepfer

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellImmune systemTransplantationMedicineImmunologyInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improved differentiation protocols allow large-scale generation of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) -derived islets. In order to make allogeneic “off-the-shelf” islets clinically useful and avoid rejection absent immunosuppression (IS) , they need to evade host immune responses, a property we refer to as being “hypoimmune.” Rhesus macaque (NHP) iPSCs were engineered to knock-out function of MHC class I and II and overexpress CD47 (HIP iPSCs) . HIP iPSCs and unedited iPSCs (wt iPSCs) were transduced to express luciferase and transplanted IM into four allogeneic NHPs per group. There was a strong IFN-γ ELISpot T cell response 1 week after wt iPSC transplantation, and increased production of wt-iPSC specifc IgM antibodies (Ab) and IgG Abs. At all time points tested (up to 12 weeks) , PBMCs killed wt iPSCs via direct and Ab-mediated cellular cytotoxicity. Furthermore, serum from NHPs killed wt iPSCs via complement-dependent cytotoxicity. In contrast, NHPs that received HIP iPSCs showed no measurable immune response against HIP iPSCs at all time points. After 6 weeks, NHPs initially receiving wt iPSCs were injected with HIP iPSCs. Although the NHPs maintained their strong immune response against wt iPSCs, they did not mount any response against HIP iPSCs. NHPs receiving HIP iPSCs first developed a strong cellular and Ab-response against the subsequently injected wt iPSCs but continued to have no reactivity against HIP iPSCs. Bioluminescence imaging in vivo revealed rejection of all wt iPSC grafts in both groups within 2-3 weeks after transplantation, while all HIP iPSC grafts survived the study period of 16 weeks. As a step to extending these studies to human iPSCs, we created human HIP iPSCs. We were able to differentiate these human HIP iPSCs into functional HIP islet cells that evaded host immune responses. This work suggests that HIP modifications do not impact islet cell differentiation or function. These data support the development of allogeneic HIP islets for the treatment of patients with T1DM. Disclosure X.Hu: None. F.Wells: None. T.Mcgill: Employee; Sana Biotechnology Inc. M.Rukstalis: Employee; Sana Biotechnology Inc. C.Gattis: None. R.Basco: None. J.R.Millman: Consultant; Sana Biotechnology Inc., Other Relationship; Sana Biotechnology Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Research Support; Sana Biotechnology Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Salentra Biosciences. S.Schrepfer: Other Relationship; Sana Biotechnology Inc. K.White: None. A.G.Olroyd: None. R.Dejesus: None. A.Dominguez: Employee; Sana Biotechnology Inc. W.E.Dowdle: Employee; Sana Biotechnology Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Sana Biotechnology Inc. E.Y.L.Chu: None. A.Friera: None. C.Young: Employee; Sana Biotechnology Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207