Identification and Utilization of a Chemical Probe to Interrogate the Roles of PIKfyve in the Lifecycle of β-Coronaviruses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From a designed library of indolyl pyrimidinamines we identified a highly potent and cell-active chemical probe (analog 17) that inhibits phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate 5-kinase (PIKfyve). Comprehensive evaluation of inhibitor selectivity confirmed that this PIKfyve probe demonstrates excellent kinome-wide selectivity. A structurally related indolyl pyrimidinamine (analog 30) was characterized as a suitable negative control analog that lacks PIKfyve inhibitory activity and exhibits exquisite selectivity when profiled against the screenable human kinome. Our chemical probe disrupts multiple phases of the life cycle of β-coronaviruses. We observed potent inhibition of viral replication, reduced viral entry, and impacts on a mediator of viral transmission (lysosomes). Our scaffold is a distinct chemotype versus published PIKfyve inhibitors and lacks the canonical morpholine hinge-binder of classical lipid kinase inhibitors. Our chemical probe set can be used by the community to characterize the role of PIKfyve in virology and beyond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".