MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294379422 · doi:10.1002/ana.26492

Association of Presynaptic Loss with Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Decline

2022· article· en· W4294379422 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Guoyu Lan, Yue Cai, Anqi Li, Zhen Liu, Shaohua Ma, Tengfei Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Neurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute on AgingCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaUniversity of California, San DiegoGE HealthcareJohnson and JohnsonNational Institutes of HealthNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.U.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsRocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaShenzhen Bay LaboratoryEli Lilly and CompanyFoundation for the National Institutes of HealthNorthern California Institute for Research and Education
KeywordsGap-43 proteinCerebrospinal fluidCognitive declineInternal medicinePsychologyMedicinePathologyDementiaEndocrinologyDiseaseImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Increased presynaptic dysfunction measured by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) growth‐associated protein‐43 (GAP43) may be observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but how CSF GAP43 increases relate to AD‐core pathologies, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in AD requires further investigation. Methods We analyzed 731 older adults with baseline β‐amyloid (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET), CSF GAP43, CSF phosphorylated tau181 (p‐Tau181), and 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and longitudinal residual hippocampal volume and cognitive assessments. Among them, 377 individuals had longitudinal 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and 326 individuals had simultaneous longitudinal CSF GAP43, Aβ PET, and CSF p‐Tau181 data. We compared baseline and slopes of CSF GAP43 among different stages of AD, as well as their associations with Aβ PET, CSF p‐Tau181, residual hippocampal volume, 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and cognition cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Results Regardless of Aβ positivity and clinical diagnosis, CSF p‐Tau181‐positive individuals showed higher CSF GAP43 concentrations (p < 0.001) and faster rates of CSF GAP43 increases (p < 0.001) compared with the CSF p‐Tau181‐negative individuals. Moreover, higher CSF GAP43 concentrations and faster rates of CSF GAP43 increases were strongly related to CSF p‐Tau181 independent of Aβ PET. They were related to more rapid hippocampal atrophy, hypometabolism, and cognitive decline (p < 0.001), and predicted the progression from MCI to dementia (area under the curve for baseline 0.704; area under the curve for slope 0.717) over a median 4 years of follow up. Interpretation Tau aggregations rather than Aβ plaques primarily drive presynaptic dysfunction measured by CSF GAP43, which may lead to sequential neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment in AD or neurodegenerative diseases. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:1001–1015

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of NeurologySame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207