Final clinical and pharmacokinetic (PK) results from a phase 1 study of the novel N-cadherin (N-cad) antagonist, Exherin (ADH-1), in patients with refractory solid tumors stratified according to N-cad expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3016 Background: Malignant transformation and invasiveness correlate with upregulation of N-cad, a cell adhesion molecule expressed on tumor cells and vascular endothelium. N-cad antagonism by ADH-1, a cyclic pentapeptide (CHAVC), causes rapid tumor vascular disruption and apoptosis in preclinical models. We report the final clinical and PK results from the first human study (AHX-01–001). Methods: 46 subjects with incurable solid tumors stratified according to tumor N-cad expression were enrolled. 99 doses of ADH-1 were given by IV bolus or short infusion (31 in a Special Access Program). Doses ranged from 50–1000 mg/m 2 , with 3–6 subjects/cohort. Blood and urine were collected for PK on Day 1, assayed by LC/MS/MS, and a 2 compartment analysis was performed. Results: ADH-1 was generally well tolerated and the maximum tolerated dose was not defined. The most commonly reported adverse events were grade 1–2 fatigue (59%), nausea (32%), dysgeusia (25%), and flushing (20%). 4 subjects in the N-cad positive group (n=28, including 3 N-cad unknown) demonstrated anti-tumor activity; a PR of 6 month duration in refractory esophageal carcinoma; a minor response in lung metastases from an unknown primary following a single dose; and >7 months SD in refractory adrenocortical and colorectal carcinoma. No anti-tumor activity was noted in the N-cad negative group (n=18). The mean initial ADH-1 half-life (t½) was 20 min and the mean terminal phase t½ was 2.2 hr. Mean systemic clearance (CL) was 6.5 L/hr/m 2 . Both t½ and CL were independent of dose. C max increased dose proportionally, ranging from 7 to148 μg/mL, and AUC 0- ∞ tended to increase dose proportionally. The volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) averaged 14.3 L/m 2 , indicating modest tissue distribution. Approximately 30% of the dose was excreted unchanged in the urine. Conclusions: ADH-1 was generally well tolerated and demonstrated evidence of anti-tumor activity in subjects with N-cad positive tumors. The PK profile was biphasic and the t½ averaged 2.2 hr. C max and AUC 0- ∞ increased dose proportionally, and CL was independent of dose. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".