Abstract A031: Interplay of YAP1, β-catenin and the SS18-SSX fusion protein in synovial sarcoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Synovial sarcoma (SySa) is a rare soft-tissue malignancy characterized by a specific chromosomal translocation t(X;18). The resulting chimeric SS18-SSX fusion protein drives SySa pathogenesis by dysregulating gene transcription. As therapeutic targeting of SS18-SSX is notoriously difficult, the identification of SS18-SSX-dependent pathomechanisms may uncover novel molecular vulnerabilities. Since previous functional analyses revealed a connection between SS18-SSX and the activity of the transcriptional co-regulators YAP1/TAZ and β-catenin, this study examined a potential crosstalk between these effectors in SySa. Experimental Procedures: Nuclear abundance of YAP1/TAZ and β-catenin was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in a large cohort of SySa tissue specimens. Two SySa cell lines were employed to modulate YAP1/TAZ/β-catenin transcriptional activity by RNAi-mediated knockdown, small molecule inhibitors, and overexpression vectors in vitro. Changes in transcriptional activity were determined via luciferase reporter assays. As YAP1 and β-catenin showed highest interdependence, co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed to investigate their interplay with the SS18-SSX fusion protein in SySa cells. Results: Immunohistochemically, a substantial subset of SySa tissue specimens showed concurrent nuclear accumulation of YAP1/TAZ and β-catenin. In vitro, SS18-SSX was found to promote YAP1/TAZ and β-catenin transcriptional activity. RNAi-mediated knockdown of YAP1, TAZ or β-catenin and small molecule inhibitor treatment mutually downregulated TEAD and TCF luciferase reporter activity, while expression of hyperactive variants led to a reciprocal luciferase reporter induction. Finally, co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated nuclear co-localization of SS18-SSX with YAP1 and β-catenin in SySa cell lines. Conclusions: This study reveals an interdependency between YAP1 and β-catenin activation and a complex interplay with the SySa-specific SS18-SSX fusion protein. Citation Format: Ilka Isfort, Ruth Berthold, Lorena Heinst, Eva Wardelmann, Marcel Trautmann, Wolfgang Hartmann. Interplay of YAP1, β-catenin and the SS18-SSX fusion protein in synovial sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A031.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".