MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304775599 · doi:10.3390/v14102241

Ampliseq for Illumina Technology Enables Detailed Molecular Epidemiology of Rabies Lyssaviruses from Infected Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues

2022· article· en· W4304775599 on OpenAlexafffund
Susan A. Nadin‐Davis, Allison Hartke, Mingsong Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueViruses · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
FundersCanadian Food Inspection Agency
KeywordsAmpliconRabies virusRabiesBiologyMultiplexGenomeMassive parallel sequencingPrimer (cosmetics)DNA sequencingVirologyLyssavirusComputational biologyShotgun sequencingIon semiconductor sequencingPolymerase chain reactionGeneticsRhabdoviridaeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole genome sequencing of rabies lyssaviruses (RABVs) has enabled the generation of highly detailed phylogenies that reveal viral transmission patterns of disease in reservoir species. Such information is highly important for informing best practices with respect to wildlife rabies control. However, specimens available only as formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples have been recalcitrant to such analyses. Due to the damage inflicted by tissue processing, only relatively short amplicons can be generated by standard RT-PCR methods, making the generation of full-length genome sequences very tedious. While highly parallel shotgun sequencing of total RNA can potentially overcome these challenges, the low percentage of reads representative of the virus may be limiting. Ampliseq technology enables massively multiplex amplification of nucleic acids to produce large numbers of short PCR products. Such a strategy has been applied to the sequencing of entire viral genomes but its use for rabies virus analysis has not been reported previously. This study describes the generation of an Ampliseq for Illumina primer panel, which was designed based on the global sequence diversity of rabies viruses, and which enables efficient viral genome amplification and sequencing of rabies-positive FFPE samples. The subsequent use of such data for detailed phylogenetic analysis of the virus is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVirusesSame topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207