MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306156061 · doi:10.1094/phyto-07-22-0262-sa

Development of Genome-Driven, Lifestyle-Informed Markers for Identification of the Cereal-Infecting Pathogens <i>Xanthomonas translucens</i> Pathovars <i>undulosa</i> and <i>translucens</i>

2022· article· en· W4306156061 on OpenAlexaff
Verónica Román-Reyna, Rebecca D. Curland, Yesenia Vélez-Negrón, Kristi E. Ledman, Diego E. Gutierrez-Castillo, Jonathan Beutler, Jules Butchacas, Gurcharn S. Brar, R. H. Roberts, Ruth Dill‐Macky, Jonathan M. Jacobs

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytopathology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureAmerican Malting Barley Association
KeywordsPathovarBiologyXanthomonas campestrisOutbreakXanthomonasMicrobiologyVirologyGeneticsBacteriaPseudomonadaceaePseudomonas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacterial leaf streak, bacterial blight, and black chaff caused by Xanthomonas translucens pathovars are major diseases affecting small grains. Xanthomonas translucens pv. translucens and X. translucens pv. undulosa are seedborne pathogens that cause similar symptoms on barley, but only X. translucens pv. undulosa causes bacterial leaf streak of wheat. Recent outbreaks of X. translucens have been a concern for wheat and barley growers in the Northern Great Plains; however, there are limited diagnostic tools for pathovar differentiation. We developed a multiplex PCR based on whole-genome differences to distinguish X. translucens pv. translucens and X. translucens pv. undulosa. We validated the primers across different Xanthomonas and non- Xanthomonas strains. To our knowledge, this is the first multiplex PCR to distinguish X. translucens pv. translucens and X. translucens pv. undulosa. These molecular tools will support disease management strategies enabling detection and pathovar incidence analysis of X. translucens. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytopathologySame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207