MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306407989 · doi:10.1101/2022.10.13.511954

A human DCC variant causing mirror movement disorder reveals an essential role for the Wave regulatory complex in Netrin/DCC signaling

2022· preprint· en· W4306407989 on OpenAlexafffund
Karina Chaudhari, Kaiyue Zhang, Patricia T. Yam, Yixin Zang, Daniel A. Kramer, Sabrina Schlienger, Sara Calabretta, Meagan Collins, Myriam Srour, Baoyu Chen, Frédéric Charron, Greg J. Bashaw

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNetrinAxon guidanceDeleted in Colorectal CancerBiologyAxonCell biologyGeneticsNeuroscienceCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The axon guidance cue, Netrin-1, signals through its receptor DCC to attract commissural axons to the midline. Pathogenic variants in DCC frequently lead to congenital mirror movements (CMM), but how these variants impact DCC function is largely unknown. Screening of DCC in individuals with CMM recently revealed a novel variant located in a conserved motif in the cytoplasmic tail of DCC that is predicted to bind to a central actin nucleation promoting factor, the WAVE regulatory complex (WRC). Here, we use biochemical and axon guidance assays to show that this CMM-associated DCC variant is pathogenic by disrupting the interaction between DCC and the WRC. This DCC-WRC interaction is evolutionarily conserved and is required for Netrin-1 mediated commissural axon outgrowth and guidance. Together, we identify the WRC as a pivotal component of Netrin-1/DCC signaling and further provide a molecular mechanism explaining how genetic variants in DCC may lead to CMM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingFrench-language works237,207