Nociceptor neurons affect cancer immunosurveillance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Solid tumors are innervated by nerve fibers that arise from the autonomic and sensory peripheral nervous systems. In prostate cancer, doublecortin-expressing neural progenitors initiate autonomic adrenergic neurogenesis1 which facilitates tumor development and dissemination2, via an angiogenic switch that fuels cancer growth3,4. Similarly, a loss of TP53 drives the reprogramming of tumor-innervating sensory nerves into adrenergic neurons in head and neck tumors, which promotes tumor growth5. However, the impact of tumor neo-innervation by pain-initiating sensory neurons remains unclear. We show that melanoma cells interact with nociceptors, increasing neurite outgrowth, responsiveness to noxious ligands, and neuropeptide release. In turn, CGRP, a nociceptor-produced neuropeptide, directly increases exhaustion of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells (PD1+Lag3+Tim3+IFNγ-), limiting their capacity to eliminate melanoma. Genetic NaV1.8 or TRPV1 lineage ablation, local pharmacological silencing or blockade of neuropeptide release from tumor-innervating nociceptors, and the antagonism of the CGRP receptor RAMP1, all blunt tumor-infiltrating leukocyte exhaustion, and tumor growth, nearly tripling survival of B16F10-inoculated mice. Inversely, CD8+ T-cell exhaustion increased following optogenetic activation of tumor-innervating NaV1.8 neurons+ and was rescued in sensory neuron depleted mice treated with recombinant CGRP. In comparison to wild-type CD8+ T-cells, RAMP1-/- CD8+ T-cells were protected from undergoing exhaustion when co-transplanted into tumor-bearing Rag1 deficient mice. Single-cell RNA sequencing of patient tumors revealed that intratumoral RAMP1-expressing CD8+ T-cells are more exhausted than their RAMP1 negative counterparts. RAMP1 expression in intratumoral CD8+ T-cells was also associated with resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, while RAMP1 overexpression within the tumor correlated with a worse clinical prognosis. We conclude that reducing CGRP release from tumor-innervating nociceptors, by eliminating its immunomodulatory action on cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells, constitutes a useful strategy to safeguard anti-tumor immunity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".