MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308006822 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.991143

RETRACTED: CSF p-tau as a potential cognition impairment biomarker in ALS

2022· article· en· W4308006822 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhongying Gong, Lina Gao, Yi Lü, Zhiyun Wang

Post-publication record

NatureRetraction
ReasonConcerns/Issues about Data;Investigation by Journal/Publisher;Original Data and/or Images not Provided and/or not Available;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;
Date3/4/2024 0:00
Flagged by OpenAlex?Yes

Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive impairmentBiomarkerPsychologyNeuroscienceCognitionMedicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum tau (t-tau, p-tau) are potential biomarkers for neurodegeneration in Alzheimer disease (AD), but their role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is unclear. Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate CSF and serum p-tau and t-tau in patients with ALS and to analyze the correlation and clinical parameters between them. Methods: CSF and serum samples were obtained from 90 patients with ALS, 48 other neurological disease (OND), and 20 with AM (ALS mimic, AM) diseases. The levels of p-tau and t-tau in the CSF and serum were assessed with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and disease progression parameters, including the duration, the ALSFRS-R score, disease progression rate (DPR), the upper motor neuron (UMN) score, the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) score, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS) results, were analyzed by registered neurologists. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism software. Results: Compared with controls, patients with ALS displayed significantly lower levels of CSF p-tau and p-tau:t-tau ratio. The CSF p-tau level in patients with ALS and cognition impairment was higher than that in patients with ALS who did not have cognition impairment. CSF p-tau level was negatively correlated with MMSE, MoCA, and ECAS total score and the specific score of ECAS in patients with ALS and cognition impairment. Conclusions: The CSF p-tau level and p-tau:t-tau ratio were lower in patients with ALS than patients with OND and AM. Results suggest that CSF p-tau may be used as an index of cognition impairment in patients with ALS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207