MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4308976783 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac209.327

CTNI-62. LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LAROTRECTINIB IN PATIENTS WITH TROPOMYOSIN RECEPTOR KINASE (TRK) FUSION PRIMARY CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) TUMORS

2022· article· en· W4308976783 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Perreault, Alexander Drilon, Ulrik Lassen, Birgit Geoerger, Karsten Nysom, Ingrid Øra, Igor T. Gavrilovic, Ricarda Norenberg, Vadim Bernard-Gauthier, Esther De La Cuesta, Theodore W. Laetsch, François Doz, Cornelis M. van Tilburg

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBayer (Canada)Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrk receptorMedicineInternal medicineConfidence intervalClinical endpointGliomaOncologyGastroenterologySurgeryClinical trialReceptorNeurotrophinCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Larotrectinib is a highly selective TRK inhibitor that demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 30% and a 24-week disease control rate (DCR) of 73% across 33 evaluable adult and pediatric patients with TRK fusion primary CNS tumors, as of July 2020 (Doz et al, Neuro Oncol 2021). We report updated data on an expanded dataset. METHODS Patients with TRK fusion primary CNS tumors in two clinical trials (NCT02637687, NCT02576431) were included. Responses were investigator-assessed. RESULTS As of July 2021, 38 patients with TRK fusion primary CNS tumors (median age, 10.8 [range 1.3–79.0] years) were identified: high-grade glioma (HGG; n = 23), low-grade glioma (LGG; n = 9), and other (n = 6). Sixteen (42%) patients had ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. ORR for 37 evaluable patients was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16–47): three complete responses, eight partial responses, 21 stable disease (16 patients ≥ 24 weeks), and five progressive disease. For pediatric patients (n = 28), the ORR was 39% (95% CI 22–59). For pediatric patients with HGG and LGG, ORRs were 43% (95% CI 18–71) and 38% (95% CI 9–76), respectively. ORRs for patients with 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 prior therapies were 33%, 20%, 38%, and 38%, respectively. Median time to response was 1.9 months. The 24-week DCR was 73% (95% CI 56–86). Median duration of response (DoR) was not reached; 12-month DoR rate was 64%. Median progression-free survival was 16.5 months (95% CI 6.7–not estimable). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 24-month OS rate was 65%. Treatment duration ranged from 0.1+ to 38.7+ months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mostly Grade 1–2. No patients discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. CONCLUSION Larotrectinib demonstrated a high DCR, rapid and durable responses, and a manageable safety profile in patients with TRK fusion primary CNS tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→