CTIM-32. FIRST-IN-CHILDREN PHASE 1 TRIAL OF INDOXIMOD-BASED CHEMO-IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS: ANALYSIS OF SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND 5-YEAR OUTCOME
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Recurrent brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer death in children. We conducted a first-in-children, two-institution, Phase 1 open-label dose-confirmation study using a 3 + 3 design, with expansion cohorts, to determine the recommended pediatric dose of the IDO pathway-inhibitor indoximod (NCT02502708). DESIGN/ METHODS Eligible patients were 3-22 years old with either recurrent malignant brain tumor or newly-diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Palliative radiation, surgery or dexamethasone were allowed as needed for patient management. Separate dose-finding arms were performed for indoximod plus temozolomide (200 mg/m2/day orally for 5 days of each 28-day cycle) and for indoximod plus conformal radiation (in patients for whom re-irradiation was planned as standard-of-care). At progression, patients who were otherwise clinically stable were offered crossover to indoximod plus a second-line chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide 2.5 mg/kg/day orally and etoposide 50 mg/m2/day orally for 21 days of each 28-day cycle). RESULTS Between December 2015 and January 2019, the study enrolled 81 brain tumor patients, including newly-diagnosed DIPG (n = 13) or recurrent ependymoma (n = 27), glioblastoma/high-grade glioma (n = 19), medulloblastoma (n = 13), or other CNS tumors ( n= 9). Median follow-up was 52 months (range 39-77 months). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the pediatric indoximod dose was determined (19.2 mg/kg/dose, given twice daily). Indoximod was well tolerated and did not affect the ability to deliver chemotherapy or radiation as planned. Median overall survival was 13.6 months (n = 81). Median overall survival was 34.7 months for the subset of patients who continued indoximod with second-line chemotherapy after progression on indoximod plus temozolomide (n = 18). CONCLUSIONS Indoximod was well tolerated and could be combined with a variety of standard treatments for pediatric brain tumors. Preliminary anti-tumor activity and overall survival suggest that indoximod with standard therapy should be further evaluated in pediatric brain tumors, and potentially other pediatric solid tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".