MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4309017992 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac209.618

PATH-45. INTRAEPIGLIOM - RAPID SEQUENCING-BASED DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN TUMORS

2022· article· en· W4309017992 on OpenAlexaff
Carolin Kubelt, Björn Brändl, Alena van Bömmel, Christian Rohrandt, Gaojianyong Wang, Maximilian Evers, Stephan Kolkenbrock, Derek Wong, Dominik Danso, André Maicher, Sönke Friedrichsen, Martin Proescholdt, Markus J. Riemenschneider, Ulrich Jetzek, Alexander Meissner, Stephen Yip, Helene Kretzmer, Michael Synowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanopore sequencingMinionMedical diagnosisComputer scienceBrain biopsyClassifier (UML)DNA sequencingMedicineArtificial intelligencePathologyBiopsyBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The intraoperative diagnosis of brain tumors remains a clinical challenge despite recent technological advances. The current clinical practice differentiates non-surgical brain tumors from those preferably treated with cytoreductive surgery employing intraoperative frozen section diagnostics. A detailed molecular diagnosis required for this classification task within the timeframe of a routine neurosurgical procedure is currently unavailable. We have analyzed a clinical cohort of several brain tumor entities using Nanopore long-read sequencing on two Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing platforms (MinION, PromethION). Since currently available molecular cancer classifiers such as the DKFZ methylation profiling classifier cannot be readily adapted to real-time sequencing analysis, we implemented a novel algorithm (MethyLYZR) to predict the underlying cancer type. Publicly available Illumina Infinium array data were used to train the classifier to distinguish 91 brain tumor classes. For validation of classification accuracy, we conducted a comprehensive validation strategy. Both nanopore platforms could sequence more than 5,000 pre-selected CpG within less than 20 minutes for most of our samples. When combining an optimized library preparation protocol with the time used for sequencing the minimal number of CpGs needed for classification, we saw sample-to-answer times of less than 1 hour – in many cases within 45 minutes - from receiving a fresh biopsy to a robust cancer type prediction. Comparing actual and predicted diagnoses resulted in a favorable error rate, indicating potentially highly clinical validity. Our real-time based molecular diagnostic algorithm enables, in most cases, a reliable diagnostic call within the timeframe of a typical neuro-oncological surgery. MethyLYZR as a predictive tool may allow us to adjust the surgical strategy and deliver the prognosis to our patients right after surgery, thus allowing for as-of-yet unexplored opportunities for the intraoperative application of individualized therapeutic modalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→